In the recent article
regarding codes for the dedications tables, I explained that as there are
so many dedications starting with MARY, it would be better to give a
separate explanation of the codes which I have allocated to them. As I
said in that article, there are at least forty-three dedications of which
MARY is the first word, so it is not possible to allocate three-letter
codes starting with MA. There are also numerous other dedications which
start with the same two letters, of which twelve are among the Scottish
dedications, so I have had to think of a means of extending the codes for
these dedications.
It is suggested that the first letter of each code should be the same
as the first letter of the dedication to which the code refers. Whenever
possible it is appropriate for the other two letters of the code to be
taken from the dedication, but with the dedications starting MA, and a few
others, this is not possible. The method which I have adopted is to create
a list of dedications from the first starting with M to the last starting
with M, and to allocate codes to each grouped under the first letter, then
under the first letter, then under the third letter, thus
| MABENA
| MAB
|
| MACCAILLE
| MAC
|
| MACCEUS or MAHEW
| MAE
|
| MACHALUS
| MAG |
and for the successive dedications to:
Note that alternate third letters, or thereabouts, are left for
possible additions. Then on to:
up to
The next batch is for six dedications under MARGARET (plus six
cross-references starting with See also ALL SAINTS & MARGARET) and
ending with MARGARET PATTENS, for which the code is MCP. Next there is the
unique MARINERS' CHURCH with code MCQ, followed by MARK, with code MDA. I
decided to provide a further code, for MARK THE EVANGELIST, at MDE.
Whether there is any mnemonic advantage in having the a of MDA and the E
in MDE is a moot point, but there is no great disadvantage. For MARTIN OF
TOURS I allocated MDR, and other dedications starting with MARTIN take us
up to MARTIN POMARY, encoded MEG. There is MEJ for MARTYRS, and MEL for
MARVENNA, which brings us to MER, a reasonably mnemonic code for MARY.
This is followed by a long series of double dedications, beginning with
MARY & ALBAN, for which the code is MET, and ending with MARY &
WALSTAN, for which the code is MIJ. So far I have found forty-five double
dedications starting with MARY, and I suspect there may be many more, I
have left forty-four gaps, such as MEU between MARY & ALBAN and MARY
& ALKELD, for codes not yet used, which I hope will provide for enough
extra codes. There is no obvious relation between the letters used for the
second and third code letters, and those in the respective dedications,
but I have not found any easy way of providing this.
The next batch of dedications starting with MARY begins with MARY at
AXE, for which the code is MJA, and the last is MARY the VIRGIN & MARY
MAGDALENE (double dedication) for which the code is MKU. Again there is no
obvious relation between the letters of the codes and of the dedications,
but there are twenty-two entries in this batch, and as many gaps for
unused codes in the same way as for the previous batch.
A final batch begins with MARY, and is distinguished by a following
comma, unlike any of the foregoing dedications. They are double, triple
or, in one case, quadruple dedications, ending with MARY, URSULA & the
ELEVEN THOUSAND VIRGINS, for which the code is MLN. This is followed by
MARY MAGDALENE with code MLP. The last dedications beginning with MA start
with MATTHEW with code MMA and end with MAZOTA with code MMZ. Then we turn
to dedications beginning with M followed by other letters, starting with
MEADHRAN, but I will not go into details of these.
Limiting the statistical survey of this study, the present count of
entries starting with the name MARY totals eighty-four, which includes
sixteen lines of See also references, mostly of double dedications such as
CHRIST & MARY, though also of festivals associated with MARY such as
THE ANNUNCIATION. More numerous are those entries in which the name of
MARY precedes another name or title, such as MARY & ALBAN or MARY
& ALL SAINTS, totalling forty-five.
As previously indicated, I am not entirely satisfied with the methods
which I have adopted for providing codes when there are sequences of
dedications starting with the same letters or words, of which MARY is the
most difficult, and should appreciate suggestions for alternative methods.