by Timothy Gordon Barclay [1]
With several inconsistencies in the history of the first family of Berkeley having been exposed in the last few decades, there has gradually become a need for a complete re-examination of the material upon which this history has been based. The following investigation reveals a startling number of spurious records and misconceptions forming much of the basis for the accepted story. By careful comparison and evaluation of both the older and new evidence, a much improved account of the descendants of the first reeve of Berkeley has also been produced. This has implications for a vast body of contemporary research.
Foundations (2017) 9: 47-70 © Copyright FMG and the author